<
p style="text-align: justify;">At the Château d'Yquem, one of the greatest dinners with exce
ptional wines
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The dinner will be held at the
pan style="color: blue;">Château d'Yquempan>, with my wines. I came to deliver them two months ago and I worked to build the menu with the chef of the castle
pan style="color: blue;">Olivier Brulardpan> best worker of France (MOF) 1996 who worked during his career es
pecially with Michel Guérard.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The day of the dinner, at noon we
present ourselves to the castle. Valérie, the
precious collaborator of the
president of Yquem who assisted Alexandre de Lur Saluces and now
Pierre Lurton will be
present at the traditional lunch
preceding my dinners in this
place, while Sandrine Garbay and Francis Mayeur, the two who make Yquem and attended the
previous lunches before my dinners will not be there, held back by other obligations. We will be four to test dinner dishes, two American friends, Valerie and me.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">I brought a
pan style="color: red;">Maury of Vignerons de Maury 1929pan> which can accom
pany the dishes that we will test but will not serve as a witness, because it is very different wines that will be on the dishes tonight. The first dish that we try is the lobster cooked gently on the salt
pan with
pretty scales of truffles. The dish is delicious. The chervil in fine leaves refreshes well the dish as well as the leaves of chard but it is necessary to remove the heart of chard too abundant and bitter and to kee
p only tiny stam
ps of this vegetable. We drink a
pan style="color: red;">'Y' Yquem 2016pan> very green and a little too dry, which will ex
pand during the rest of the meal. The Maury is very suitable for lobster and creates a nice deal because this 16 ° wine has a lot of freshness. He has aged in demi-muids for more than sixty years which gave him a beautiful fluidity and a great delicacy. The dish will accom
pany two montrachets, one of the domain of Romanée Conti and one of Ramonet. Olivier agrees to make a smaller dish, more airy and less salty. We understand each other well.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">We then try the foie gras. In the menu it is
planned: Mr. Du
périer's foie gras, lightly smoked and then
poached, with salt and
pe
pper. The
plate includes foie gras in two ways,
poached and smoked. It seems to me at once that the smoked will not be useful, because Lafite 1878 will not acce
pt it. We must also remove the
pine nuts
planted in the livers. It turns out that Olivier who
pre
pared the livers will not be able to
put two slices of
poached
per
person so the solution we ado
pt is that the smoked foie gras be served as a second course for the Burgundies, after the
pigeon, and the foie gras
poché will be as
planned for the Lafite. We drink
pan style="color: red;">Chateau d'Yquem 2016pan>, wonderful in its crazy youth because it has the candor and rosy cheeks of a baby. And that goes well with the livers. The Maury also finds its
place with the non-smoked liver. The 2016 Yquem will be big, a Yquem cooler than
powerful.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">Usually in my dinners there is only one blue cheese for sauternes. But by dint of arguing with Olivier, we are going to have five blue cheeses: three English, stilton, stichelton, shro
pshire, and two French blues, the Régalis com
position of Dominique Bouchait, a cheese MOF, and a fourme also of its com
position. It is u
p to me to decide the order of service of these five cheeses which will be
presented on individual
plates what I do with good heart by checking that both the Yquem 2016 and the Maury 1929 feast on these cheeses. Stilton and Stichelton are my two favorite
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The dessert is an 18-carat crunch of mango
picked ri
pe with
passion fruit juice. I have a little trouble with the lum
p of the cris
p, the laminated breaks in the mouth, but as my lovely guests are accommodated, we will not touch this traditional reci
pe of Landes will be
perfect for the three Sauternes of 1937 , 1917 and 1891.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">We make the debriefing with Olivier Brulard. I change the size of the knives to cut the lobster, I exclude the breads for the
plate of cheese, I determine the
position of the glasses on table, because we will have fourteen glasses who will remain on the s
pot, I give the instructions of service of the wine com
pared to the dishes. Everything seems on track. This evening Olivier will be assisted by the Cheval Blanc chef to take advantage of this ex
perience.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">After a walk and a tiny na
p, I'm ready for the o
pening of the wines. Valerie has reinforced the usual kitchen team of the castle and there will be a sommelier for the service of the wines, who assists in addition to my American friends at this ceremony. I o
pen the wines in the order of service. The Domaine de la Romanée Conti 1997 Montrachet has a fragrance of rare generosity. He is fat and ha
ppy. The Montrachet Domaine Ramonet 1978 scares me. I dread a
possible taste of ca
p, des
pite the fact that the ca
p does not smell ca
p. The sommelier does not smell anything. Ho
pefully everything is going well. The
perfume of the Cheval Blanc 1945 is im
perial and glorious.
Phew! Because I would have been embarrassed if the wine that runs
Pierre Lurton was not u
p to
par.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The Mouton Rothschild 1928 has a scent that seems to me of rare delicacy. For now, that's fine.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The Mazy Chambertin Armand Rousseau 1966 has a devilish scent. It is all the earthly and laborious Burgundy that ex
plodes in my nostrils. Conversely, the La Tâche Domaine de la Romanée Conti 1983 has a noble and distinguished
perfume while restraint. It was going well for Bordeaux, it goes well for Burgundy. As Laetitia, Na
poleon's mother, said, "let us ho
pe that it will go on that way".
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The Lafite-Rothschild 1878 has a miraculous fragrance. The bottle was reconditioned at the castle in 1990. The wine has a very clear ruby color. The wine looks sweet. There too, I
push a "
phew" of satisfaction. The Sigalas Rabaud 1917 is a huge sur
prise because its
perfume (I do not taste any wine, I feel it only)
plays in the big leagues. It will match the thundering scent of Yquem 1937, which comes from Yquem's cellar and has never moved, and with the fragrance of a confusing subtlety of Yquem 1891. And the last
piece of cake, like Liz Taylor being Cleo
patra, it is the unmistakable
perfume of the Malaga 1872, concentrated with the fragrances of the Arabian Nights.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The o
pening o
peration lasted an hour and a half because I fought with many corks which did not want to go out. And I had a fright that gave me sweats, it is with the ca
p of the Yquem 1891 which, as soon as I cut the ca
psule went down in the neck and would have
plunged in the liquid if I had not been able to gri
p it by mani
pulating it with extreme gentleness since every attem
pt to
poke the cork made it go down.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">Exhausted by these 90 minutes of
permanent tension I go back to my room to
pre
pare because the festivities begin in half an hour. Under my shower I have the smug smile of the idiot of the village, I am 'Lou delighted' because I know that my wines will be at the rendezvous.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The rendezvous of the dinner is at 6
pm in the oldest living room of the Château d'Yquem. We will be twelve at table, received by
pan style="color: blue;">Pierre Lurtonpan>,
president of Yquem and Cheval Blanc. Our assembly of eight men and four women is very cosmo
politan with three Americans from three different cities, Charlotte, Boston and San Francisco, a French living in New York, a French living in Singa
pore with his Ja
panese-born wife, two Chinese living in Oxford, an Italian, a German and me. Six
partici
pants were at some of my greatest dinners. Four guests
partici
pate for the first time. We introduce ourselves and
Pierre Lurton joins us to welcome us. He makes us visit the cellars and quickly gives ex
planations on the botrytis, the harvest and the aging of Yquem. We then go to the beautiful tasting room to taste three young Yquem. Their colors are very close and very clear, the 2001 being slightly more amber.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">
Pierre Lurton says he
prefers the
pan style="color: red;">Château d'Yquem 2015pan> that we drink to the 2016. I agree with him for the future because the 2015 is
powerful and rich. But for the immediate
pleasure I
prefer the 2016 drunk at lunch, more fluid, more delicate, while the 2015 is very marked by a strong sugar.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">
pan style="color: red;">Château d'Yquem 2009pan> is a marvel of balance. He has everything for him. It evokes me gladly the 1893 which is
probably the most balanced of all the Yquem. This 2009 is the joy of living.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The
pan style="color: red;">Château d'Yquem 2001pan> is a
punch in my heart. This 2001 is a conquering Yquem warrior and in my imagination, while I never drank the 1847, the most famous Yquem with 1811, I imagine the 2001 is as big and legendary as the 1847. This Yquem has everything for him.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">After this quick tasting commented by
Pierre Lurton always so truculent, we go to the large antique lounge for a
peritif. I o
pened all the wines but I did not o
pen any cham
pagne. So for me this is a big unknown, because if we start with a tired cham
pagne, it can change the atmos
phere of dinner. I
pray the sky and the sommelier
pours me the first glass of the
pan style="color: red;">Champagne Louis Roederer 1928pan>. The color is almost
pink. There is no bubble but in the mouth I feel the s
parkling and,
phew, the cham
pagne is of exem
plary
purity. It is
precise, does not have a gram of defect and its taste is charming, intense, dee
p. It is an immense cham
pagne of 1928. It leaves in the mouth a strong trace made of beautiful red fruits.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">
pan style="color: red;">Champagne Dom Pérignon 1959pan> is o
pen and if the
pschitt is weak, the bubble is more visible and the color is lighter. It's obviously a big Dom
Pérignon, vinous, active and
present, but I admit that I have a soft s
pot for the more com
plex Louis Roederer. Small cana
pés are delicate.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">We sit at the table in the very
pretty dining room of the castle. The menu designed by Olivier Brulard, chef of the castle and develo
ped with me is: a
ppetizers to enjoy with fingerti
ps / langoustines "blue" with fresh water gra
pefruit, Royal caviar in dress field / cooked lobster gently in the saltire,
pretty scales of truffles first / line bar in autumn coat / squab "Great Tradition" / foie gras M. Du
périer slightly smoked /
poached foie gras, with croque-au-sel / selected cheeses and refined by Dominique Bouchait MOF / Cris
p "18 Carats" of mango
picked ri
pe with
passion / financial juice from a mouthful of licorice.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The
pan style="color: red;">Champagne Charles Heidsieck 1955pan> is like the two
previous ones of a
purity and a remarkable
precision. My guests wonder how it is
possible to have three cham
pagnes as old, so at risk, which are so
perfect. The 1955 is racy, long, with a strong
personality that will find with the lobster and gra
pefruit water jelly an agreement that is
probably the best of the meal with the one that we will have on a
poached foie gras. The
presentation of the dish is of a remarkable aesthetic. The cham
pagne vibrates with the flesh of the langoustine served fresh but even more with the water of gra
pefruit. And the end
point is given by the caviar highlighted by a sweet
potato that gives a boost to the cham
pagne. Of the three cham
pagnes, it is the Dom
Pérignon which made its age that is to say a beautiful maturity, while the other two because of their intensity have no age.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">On lobster we have two montrachets. The
pan style="color: red;">Montrachet Domaine de la Romanée Conti 1997pan> has the glorious nose of the estate's Montrachet. Theoretically it is not a very
powerful year, but in
practice it is flamboyant and very broad. He is not as fat as others who are more
powerful, but he is joyfully thick and intense.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The
pan style="color: red;">Montrachet Grand Cru Domaine Ramonet 1978pan> is very different. First of all, he does not have the slightest trace of a cork that I feared. I was scared for nothing. If the 1997 is an extreme width, giving a joyful mouth, the 1978 is all in de
pth and refinement. To
prefer one or the other is not easy. The Italian friend
prefers the Ramonet which is of an ideal
presentation and has no age. The Ramonet is very racy, the Conti is very gourmand. I would say that for the
perfect lobster and generously truffled, it is the 1997 Conti that is the most rewarding. But the nobility of Ramonet is extreme.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The mushroom line bar is accom
panied by two great Bordeaux and many guests will admire the relevance of an agreement they would not have imagined.
pan style="color: red;">Château Cheval Blanc Fourcaud Laussac 1945pan> has a truffle nose of extreme
power and on the
palate, it is generous,
powerful, concentrated, square, glorious and so good that one would be ready to
place it over the most legendary 1947 Cheval Blanc which more more aty
pical. This truffled wine is a s
plendor and I am ha
ppy to have
put it in the
presence of the one who runs the Cheval Blanc castle. The wine has such a balance that it seems indestructible and built for eternity.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">Beside him, the
pan style="color: red;">Château Mouton Rothschild 1928pan> is an exce
ptional Mouton, full of charm and enigmas. He is elusive. I am totally under his s
pell. The Cheval Blanc is masculine, solid warrior while the Mouton is feminine, all in charm. And what's good is that the two wines do not harm each other, on the contrary, we go from one to the other by develo
ping our
pleasure. We drink two huge wines and I did not ex
pect Mouton 1928 to be so com
plex and brilliant.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The
pigeon accom
panies two Burgundy wines, and here again, as for the Montrachets and the Bordeaux wines, two very different wines. The
pan style="color: red;">Mazy Chambertin Grand Cru Domaine Armand Rousseau 1966pan> has a diabolical nose to wake the dead. This is the affirmation of Burgundy the most earthly, hardworking, feet in the clay. It is a Burgundy that takes the guts and in the mouth we have a wine of
pleasure, nature, diabolically attractive.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">Beside,
pan style="color: red;">La Tâche Domaine de la Romanée Conti 1983pan> is carrying the subtlety of the domaine of Romanée Conti. We are in elegance. The
pigeon s
peaks a lot more with Mazy Chambertin. While the smoked foie gras that is served after converse elegantly with La Tâche. I have a soft s
pot for the most 'commoner' of the two.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">
pan style="color: red;">Château Lafite-Rothschild 1878pan> is like the 1955 Charles Heidsieck alone on a dish, on
poached foie gras. This wine was reconditioned at the château in 1990 with the marks attesting to this o
peration. The wine has a beautiful color very young. The nose is intense. It is incredible finesse, nobility and accom
plishment. It seems so natural. I s
poke discreetly with
Pierre Lurton, who agrees with me, the age feels with a slightly meaty taste
probably latent and arisen during refilling, which signs the authenticity of the wine and does not harm the
pleasure to the
point that this wine will be the only one to a
ppear on the twelve voting sheets, devoting its first
place to the wines of the meal. The accord with the foie gras is magical and the sweetness highlights all the subtleties of the wine. We had at a
previous dinner a su
perb Lafite 1898. This one is at least the same level, maybe a little more romantic and delicate. It is a 140 year old anthology.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">At this stage we wonder how we will be able to
prioritize wines as different and all
perfect. It is now the moment of the three Sauternes served at the same time. From left to right we have Château Sigalas Rabaud 1917, Château d'Yquem 1937, Château d'Yquem 1891. The colors of the two extremes are almost identical, of a very dark mahogany, and the 1937 is amber but lighter than the two others. These three wines will have two services, the five cheeses then the dessert.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The
pan style="color: red;">Château Sigalas Rabaud 1917pan> is a huge sur
prise because it is at the to
p of the elite tastes of Sauternes. It is dee
p, rich, with notes of caramel or candied banana, but it is es
pecially his race that is beautiful. He will be voted once as first and he deserves it.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The
pan style="color: red;">Château d'Yquem 1937pan> is a conquering warrior. It's the glorious, juicy, ha
ppy Yquem, it's Marlon Brando in his youth. Because this Yquem is very young, and will live many decades more.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The
pan style="color: red;">Château d'Yquem 1891pan> is of infinite com
plexity. I fall under his s
pell because he is so subtle, evocative, intriguing. His journey in the mouth is multifaceted. He has the charm, the seduction then the enigma, the subtlety, the same
plot. We never go around. I am fascinated by its com
plexity because it is not a
powerful Yquem, it is a Yquem of meditation. The cheeses have done well with the three sauternes and the agreement with the mango dessert is so natural that we enjoy it without question, because it's
perfect.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">Now comes the judicious financiers cakes on
pan style="color: red;">Malaga 1872pan> whose handwritten label bears only these mentions. I swoon. Because its exotic, unreal flavors are unimaginable. We are trans
ported to a
planet of lust. Everything is
powerful but so delicate. The length is infinite. We are in
paradise. And what makes it magical is that there are totally unfamiliar tastes.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">Joe, a faithful friend
present at Veuve Clicquot dinner and at the 200th dinner, tells me that never in his life did he have a dinner of this quality. He is thrilled and I admit that I did not ex
pect that all the wines of the dinner cannot be the object of any criticism. They are at the to
p of what they can bring. How to vote in these conditions, many tell me but it is the rule to vote.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">We are twelve to vote for the five favorite wines on fourteen wines. Thirteen wines a
ppear in the votes which confirms the excellence of all. If the Charles Heidsieck is not in the votes it is not because of its quality which is extreme, it is that at the end of the meal, the memory fades on the wines of the beginning.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">What delights me even more is that eight wines were deemed worthy of being first. Unbelievable ! Four wines were judged first twice and four wines were judged first once. The doubles first are: Lafite 1878, Yquem 1937, Yquem 1891 and Malaga 1872. The four first-time votes are: Cheval Blanc 1945, Mouton 1928, Mazy Chambertin 1966 and Sigalas Rabaud 1917. Sometimes
peo
ple say that I influence the votes. If eight wines are named first, my influence is very small.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">The consensus ranking would be:
1 - Château Lafite-Rothschild 1878, 2 - Château d'Yquem 1891, 3 - Château Mouton Rothschild 1928, 4 - Château Cheval Blanc 1945, 5 - Château d'Yquem 1937, 6 - Malaga 1872.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">My classification is:
pan style="color: blue;">1 - Malaga 1872, 2 - Château d'Yquem 1891, 3 - Château Lafite-Rothschild 1878, 4 - Château Cheval Blanc Fourcaud Laussac 1945, 5 - Champagne Louis Roederer 1928pan>.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">In a dinner where there are two excellent wines from the Domaine of Romanée Conti, note that neither of the two is among the to
p six, this indicates the level of others. One reason is that we have crowned the very old wines since the average age of the six classified wines is 110 years old. This ex
plains that.
p>
<
p style="text-align: justify;">What about this dinner otherwise than everything was
perfect. The wines made a no-fault that im
pressed the guests. Food and wine
pairings, even daring, were
perfect. The
place where the dinner was held is magical and
Pierre Lurton welcomed us with friendshi
p. It's
probably one of the three best dinners I've had, if not the biggest one. The atmos
phere of friendshi
p that has develo
ped between the guests makes it a rare dinner.
p>
(see pictures in the two following articles, one for the dinner and one for the lunch)
ps://www.academiedesvinsanciens.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/dinner-in-Yquem.png">
p-image-39125" src="https://www.academiedesvinsanciens.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/dinner-in-Yquem.png" alt="" width="405" height="536" />